Dein erstes Forum » ould be able to fix a threshold value and also

CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- Carolina Panthers middle linebacker Luke Kuechly has been cleared from the NFLs concussion protocol by independent doctors to play Monday night against the Washington Redskins, according to team spokesman Steven Drummond.But its not clear if Kuechly will play.The decision on whether or not the 2013 NFL Defensive Player of the Year will play will be up to coach Ron Rivera. The Panthers could be eliminated from playoff contention before they ever take the field and Rivera could err on the said of caution and hold him out for the final three games.Kuechly has had missed six games in the last two seasons due to concussions.He has practiced all week.We are excited to have Luke healthy and cleared from the protocol, Rivera said told the teams website Saturday. I know he is extremely motivated to get back on the field and help us win games. Whether he plays this week or not, I dont know. We have to balance our enthusiasm with whats best for Luke and the team long term.Kuechly is listed as questionable on the teams injury report.Rivera said quarterback Cam Newton is good to go Monday night, although hes listed as questionable on the injury report with a right shoulder injury.He moved around pretty well out there in practice, Rivera said Saturday.Newton had an MRI this week that revealed no series damage. Rivera has limited Newtons reps this week as a precaution.Kelvin Benjamin is also listed as questionable with a back injury, but Rivera said he looked good in practice and expects the wide receiver to play.Middle linebacker Luke Kuechlys status remains unclear. He participated full in practice again, but remains in the concussion protocol and is listed as questionable.Defensive end Charles Johnson (hamstring) and right tackle Daryl Williams (ankle) are out.---For more NFL coverage: www.pro32.ap.org and http://twitter.com/AP-NFL Nike Air Max 90 Outlet . As the crowd erupted, Davis knocked the ball off the glass and back into his hands. With 1:14 to go in overtime, Davis sixth block also became his 17th rebound. That, along with his 32 points -- which tied a career high -- proved too much for Denver to overcome, and the Pelicans held on for their third straight victory, 111-107 on Sunday night. Nike Air Max 90 From China . Gerald Green and Miles Plumlee? Green had bounced around the NBA when he wasnt playing overseas. The Pacers gave up on Plumlee after just one season. Now Green and Plumlee are key cogs in the Suns surprising breakout season. https://www.cheapnikeairmax90china.us/ . Schenn scored the game-winning goal and added two assists to lead the Philadelphia Flyers to a 4-1 win over the Calgary Flames at the Scotiabank Saddledome on Tuesday. Nike Air Max 90 Sale . The Barrie Colts defenceman, who impressed many with his play for Canada at the World Junior Hockey Championship, is the top-ranked skater in the February rankings. He has 19 goals and 24 assists for 43 points in 45 games with the Colts this season. Fake Nike Air Max 90 . Aside from the trilogy main event title fight, there are a number of intriguing matchups in the heavyweight, welterweight and lightweight divisions. With less than a week to go before the start of Indias first Test against England, the BCCI and ECB have not signed the Memorandum of Understanding, a standard agreement that details various aspects of bilateral series.The main reason for the delay in signing the MoU is that the BCCI is awaiting directions from the Lodha Committee. A big part of the MoU says the BCCI will bear all the costs pertaining to the England team during the tour. Normally the BCCI would directly approve such expenses, but because of the order passed by the Supreme Court on October 21, the board has to get approval from the Lodha Committee, which has been appointed to oversee all financial transactions of the BCCI.In its response to the BCCI, however, the Lodha Committee said forming cricket policy was not part of its remit, but that directions regarding payments could only be given after the BCCI provided more information about the transactions. The committee has given the BCCI five days to respond with details of various contracts the board said it needed to finalise in the next year to avoid disruption of daily business.But before proceeding with the matter of existing and future BCCI contracts, including the MoU with the ECB, the Lodha Committee reminded the board that an unequivocal undertaking was required from the president Anurag Thakur that the BCCI would implement the court order of October 21.The court had asked Thakur and board secretary Ajay Shirke to file affidavits in two weeks from October 21 and appear before the committee. As of November 3, Thakur had not given such an undertaking and he and Shirke had not met the committee either.BCCI and ECB officials were not available for comment about whether an unsigned MoU could jeopardise Englands tour of India, but an official from another board said an international tour could still proceed without it. An MoU is only used in case of a dispute between the two boards involved in a bilateral series.In an email on Thursday to BCCI secretary Ajay Shirke, the Lodha Committee asked the board to obey the three orders the Supreme Court passed on July 18, October 7 and 21. To avoid any hindrance to the cricketing calendar and to ensure the continued enjoyment of the sport by its aficionados, the BCCI would be well advised to comply with the directions of the Honble Supreme Court in its orders dated 18th July 2016, 7th October 2016 and 21st October 2016, the committee e-mail said.On October 21, the Supreme Court had directed the BCCI not to distribute funds to state associations until they agreed to comply with the Lodha Committees recommendations, which the court had approved in an order on July 18. The court also asked Shirke and Thakur to meet the Lodha Committee by November 3 and placed several restrictions on the boards ability to enter into contracts.The committee had already sent Thakur an email reminder earlier this week and it told Shirke on Thursday: The requirement for such an undertaking is not a mere formality. In the absence of the undertaking, the Committee finds it diffficult to implement the order of the Supreme Court by issuing necessary directions to BCCI.ddddddddddddOn October 28, Shirke had sent an email to the committee, asking for intervention on a priority basis because failing to do so would severely prejudice cricket operations. Shirke told the committee that decisions concerning a lot of important contracts had been left pending.Among the contracts mentioned was the postponed IPL tender, finalising vendors for the IPL and international and domestic cricket, and title and shirt sponsorships for the India mens team. Shirke also said the BCCI needed clarity regarding the threshold value, above which the contracts needed to go through the Lodha Committee as mandated by the Supreme Court order. The court also asked the committee to appoint an independent auditor to oversee the BCCIs transactions.Shirke said that since the court had appointed the Committee as the custodian of revenue and finances of the BCCI, it should act immediately. The board, Shirke said, feared that the uncertainty might have already devalued the size of the bids expected for the IPL television and digital rights.In its response today, the committee told Shirke that finalising vendors was not its job. Please note that neither identification nor appointment of vendors or contractors is the task or function of the Committee. The Committee is only required to fix a threshold value and approving awards of contracts above such threshold value.In order to fix the threshold value and appoint an auditor, the committee asked Shirke to provide details of the contracts such as the value, term, expiry date of existing contract, the nature of the tender process and so on. It is only on examining the above that the Committee would be able to fix a threshold value and also assess the nature of work involved for appointing the independent auditor and formulating his terms of engagement, the committee said.In another email, Shirke told the committee the BCCI had to give a commitment to the ECB regarding incurring expenses for Englands tour of India. He asked the committee to set the terms and conditions and the manner in which the agreement should be executed. Shirke had also written to the five state associations hosting the England Tests, asking if they had enough funds to stage the matches.The Committee, however, said that framing the MoU was not part of the courts order. The proposed MoU between BCCI and ECB concerns bilateral cricketing policy, the formulation of which is not a part of the mandate of the Committee. As far as payments are concerned, if they are to be made directly by the BCCI, no directions can be given by this Committee until relevant details are furnished by the BCCI.It is understood that Shirke sent the committee the unsigned MoU via email late on November 3 evening, but despite being asked for details the email did not contain what the Lodha Committee wanted. ' ' '